I had coffee with my good friend Lori this afternoon and again I went off on the tangent about my unnatural intolerance of artificial intelligence or AI. I don't know how healthy that I Prejudice is towards this seemingly innocuous if not innocent piece of programming but I certainly feel something in the negative area. Sometimes in weak moments I play with the idea of writing something and I don't think I can use the word writing specifically and be accurate with the assistance of artificial intelligence. It seems so wrong. It just seems like whatever I produce if I used AI at all wouldn't be something that I did as much as something we? Did which totally is wrong. Am I being too puritanical as far as writing goes? I wonder if it would make a difference- - I just don't know I can't even finish that thought because it all comes down to at some point in time I'll let go of my own creativity and leaned on some artificial level of creativity. I understand that I still have a long ways to go before I figure out what the answer to this question is. I wonder if I need to make samples of AI assisted and non-assisted writing. Boy that sounds like a lot of work even if I want to be writing to go through that much trouble to be pure of AI. What would be an interesting thought but what if artificial intelligence started stealing my thoughts.? That would be hard to prove at least at the very least. But what if you had a thought artificial saw that you had a thought and did developed into its own piece of writing. Then what if that writing became published somehow? How far could you take a thought like that? Rather than wrestle with all those huge questions I would just assume try to write on my own. I know this probably makes me a big doofus or maybe I'm just lazy not having to have to sift everything through an artificial intelligence sifter to separate the Rams from the ewes.
The Specter of John Boston was again brought up in our conversation. You remember John Boston that tough character I was writing about 20 or 30 years ago when I first got to Salt Lake. I don't know him anymore I don't know what he's like now I'm afraid he's somewhat burdened with age and no longer has the fight that he once had. I don't know if he really ever used it I don't know if John ever really did use the Wiley skill of the agitator to bring about change to whatever issue he thought needed changed. And like so many other cultural Heroes was basically beaten down by the common person who really didn't want to shake the banana tree for the higher fruit. But every once in awhile I get a sneaky itch to find out what happened to him. I don't know if I could actually pull it off if I did such a search and what I find at the end of that search? Just another character who desperately wanted to make a difference but was chewed up by public pathos…
had coffee with my good friend Lori this afternoon and again I went off on the tangent about my unnatural intolerance of artificial intelligence or AI. I don't know how healthy that I Prejudice is towards this seemingly innocuous if not innocent piece of programming but I certainly feel something in the negative area. Sometimes in weak moments I play with the idea of writing something and I don't think I can use the word writing specifically and be accurate with the assistance of artificial intelligence. It seems so wrong. It just seems like whatever I produce if I used AI at all wouldn't be something that I did as much as something we? Did which totally is wrong. Am I being too puritanical as far as writing goes? I wonder if it would make a difference- - I just don't know I can't even finish that thought because it all comes down to at some point in time I'll let go of my own creativity and leaned on some artificial level of creativity. I understand that I still have a long ways to go before I figure out what the answer to this question is. I wonder if I need to make samples of AI assisted and non-assisted writing. Boy that sounds like a lot of work even if I want to be writing to go through that much trouble to be pure of AI. What would be an interesting thought but what if artificial intelligence started stealing my thoughts.? That would be hard to prove at least at the very least. But what if you had a thought artificial saw that you had a thought and did developed into its own piece of writing. Then what if that writing became published somehow? How far could you take a thought like that? Rather than wrestle with all those huge questions I would just assume try to write on my own. I know this probably makes me a big doofus or maybe I'm just lazy not having to have to sift everything through an artificial intelligence sifter to separate the Rams from the ewes.
The Specter of John Boston was again brought up in our conversation. You remember John Boston that tough character I was writing about 20 or 30 years ago when I first got to Salt Lake. I don't know him anymore I don't know what he's like now I'm afraid he's somewhat burdened with age and no longer has the fight that he once had. I don't know if he really ever used it I don't know if John ever really did use the Wiley skill of the agitator to bring about change to whatever issue he thought needed changed. And like so many other cultural Heroes was basically beaten down by the common person who really didn't want to shake the banana tree for the higher fruit. But every once in awhile I get a sneaky itch to find out what happened to him. I don't know if I could actually pull it off if I did such a search and what I find at the end of that search? Just another character who desperately wanted to make a difference but was chewed up by public pathos…